Simply put, using Co-Pilot for network analysis was an agonizing experience. It’s nowhere near ready to assist network engineers in making sense of network data. From the very first prompt where I had to explicitly tell it to “analyze network data” to the incomprehensible “gobble-de-goo” diagram it eventually produced, the entire process felt more frustrating than functional.
Throughout my evaluation, I was unable to identify a single scenario in which Co-Pilot delivered meaningful assistance or demonstrated performance superior to ChatGPT. The model consistently failed to interpret packet captures accurately, frequently misclassifying protocol fields and misinterpreting fundamental networking terminology. In several test cases, Co-Pilot produced generic or contextually irrelevant summaries that added little analytical value. Moreover, it required constant manual intervention, I had to repeatedly provide explicit contextual prompts and reference details that were already present within the supplied CSV file.
That said, Co-Pilot does shine in other areas. Its AI-powered assistance across Microsoft 365 applications, automating routine Office tasks and offering contextual suggestions in Word, Excel, and Outlook is genuinely impressive. When it comes to productivity in the Office suite, Co-Pilot is leaps and bounds ahead. But for analysing network traffic? It’s simply not there yet.
Final Thoughts, ChatGPT dramatically outperforms Co-Pilot when it comes to analysing network data. It saves massive amounts of time and effort by parsing complex information and presenting it in a clear, easy-to-read format that can be shared effortlessly with colleagues. I’m afraid there is no bonus content with this one guys.